Viewing a thread - Why did it take 50 years?

Forums | Classifieds (123) | Skins | Language

You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )

Why did it take 50 years?	View previous thread :: View next thread
Forums List -> Machinery Talk	Message format

tbeck

Posted 2/8/2008 12:17 (#304625 - in reply to #304610)
Subject: Re: Why did it take 50 years?

Culbertson, MT

yes, PT axial flow for at least the first series. I think Deere had a PT 7721 as well. There's a PT axial used every fall along I94 somewhere between Belfield and Richardton, ND.

Why did it take 50 years? - trakman : 2/8/2008 07:11
- RE: Why did it take 50 years? - 4430 : 2/8/2008 07:42
  - Offset tables - Ham : 2/8/2008 08:15
    - Massey had - 4430 : 2/8/2008 10:31
- Dumping grain with gravity hopper? - Illinois John : 2/8/2008 08:13
- Re: Why did it take 50 years? - Ed Winkle : 2/8/2008 08:32
- Re: Why did it take 50 years? - JLynn : 2/8/2008 08:34
- Why not return to offset headers? - sodbuster_06 : 2/8/2008 09:00
  - Gleaner has already kinda . . . - Ed Boysun : 2/8/2008 09:34
    - RE: Gleaner has already kinda . . . - plowboy : 2/9/2008 00:01
      - RE: Gleaner has already kinda . . . - Rosco : 2/9/2008 00:17
- RE: Why did it take 50 years? - Gromit : 2/8/2008 09:13
  - Deere's 635D - rice-and-hogs : 2/8/2008 09:45
- Was there an early self propelled JD? - Don NMO : 2/8/2008 09:50
  - Re: Why did it take 50 years? - Grow : 2/8/2008 14:58
    - Re: versatile did - Rosco : 2/8/2008 15:22
      - Re: Shedding light on the subject......PIC - Rich : 2/8/2008 15:26
        
        Re: Why did it take 50 years? - Rosco : 2/8/2008 16:10
        
        Versatile SP - Ernie : 2/8/2008 20:25
  - RE: Was there an early self propelled JD? - 1206SWMO : 2/8/2008 22:01
- RE:You know - Don Kraft : 2/8/2008 10:09
  - RE:You know - 4430 : 2/8/2008 10:37
    - RE:You know - CW IL : 2/8/2008 11:27
      - Shattered soybeans felt like - 4430 : 2/8/2008 12:31
- Re: Why did it take 50 years? - B54 : 2/8/2008 11:59
- Pull Type - sodbuster_06 : 2/8/2008 12:07
  - Re: Why did it take 50 years? - tbeck : 2/8/2008 12:17
    - Here's a chart - plow79 : 2/8/2008 12:26
  - RE: Pull Type - Chad H : 2/8/2008 12:26
  - RE: Pull Type - Jon Hagen : 2/8/2008 13:40
  - RE: Pull Type - 3688 : 2/8/2008 23:10
    - RE: Pull Type - plowboy : 2/9/2008 00:06
    - RE: Pull Type - Rosco : 2/9/2008 00:41
- Re: Why did it take 50 years? - Dan_wcIN : 2/8/2008 12:36
  - Re: Why did it take 50 years? - Don Kraft : 2/8/2008 16:25
  - Re: Why did it take 50 years? - plowboy : 2/9/2008 00:13
    - Re: Why did it take 50 years? - Dan_wcIN : 2/9/2008 11:33
- Re: Why did it take 50 years? - JohnKS : 2/8/2008 19:05
  - Because of the Surplus Battleship part - Dan_wcIN : 2/8/2008 19:35
    - RE: Because of the Surplus Battleship part - Jon Hagen : 2/8/2008 19:40
      - RE: Because of the Surplus Battleship part - Dan_wcIN : 2/8/2008 20:37
        
        Re: Why did it take 50 years? - McCartman : 2/8/2008 21:40
      - Here's the Cross Flow Blower + Rotary Heat Exchanger - Dan_wcIN : 2/8/2008 22:24
        
        RE: Here's the Cross Flow Blower + Rotary Heat Exchanger - Jon Hagen : 2/8/2008 23:47
        Re: Why did it take 50 years? - trakman : 2/9/2008 07:39
        
        Yes to Twin Grain Tanks - Dan_wcIN : 2/9/2008 07:46
        Massey - Kooiker : 2/9/2008 08:44
  - Re: Why did it take 50 years? - dave morgan : 2/8/2008 23:33
    - Which Gleaner? - Ed Boysun : 2/9/2008 10:29
  - Re: Why did it take 50 years? - plowboy : 2/9/2008 00:10

Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete cookies)