Viewing a thread - Why did it take 50 years?

Forums | Classifieds (123) | Skins | Language

You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )

Why did it take 50 years?	View previous thread :: View next thread
Forums List -> Machinery Talk	Message format

B54

Posted 2/8/2008 11:59 (#304603 - in reply to #304365)
Subject: Re: Why did it take 50 years?

NC Kansas

some early case combines had the operator platform on the right hand side. sure was a different perspective from that side of the combine. it was nice though when gleaner moved the operators platform from over the feederhouse. wasn't so hard to get in and work on that area then.

Why did it take 50 years? - trakman : 2/8/2008 07:11
- RE: Why did it take 50 years? - 4430 : 2/8/2008 07:42
  - Offset tables - Ham : 2/8/2008 08:15
    - Massey had - 4430 : 2/8/2008 10:31
- Dumping grain with gravity hopper? - Illinois John : 2/8/2008 08:13
- Re: Why did it take 50 years? - Ed Winkle : 2/8/2008 08:32
- Re: Why did it take 50 years? - JLynn : 2/8/2008 08:34
- Why not return to offset headers? - sodbuster_06 : 2/8/2008 09:00
  - Gleaner has already kinda . . . - Ed Boysun : 2/8/2008 09:34
    - RE: Gleaner has already kinda . . . - plowboy : 2/9/2008 00:01
      - RE: Gleaner has already kinda . . . - Rosco : 2/9/2008 00:17
- RE: Why did it take 50 years? - Gromit : 2/8/2008 09:13
  - Deere's 635D - rice-and-hogs : 2/8/2008 09:45
- Was there an early self propelled JD? - Don NMO : 2/8/2008 09:50
  - Re: Why did it take 50 years? - Grow : 2/8/2008 14:58
    - Re: versatile did - Rosco : 2/8/2008 15:22
      - Re: Shedding light on the subject......PIC - Rich : 2/8/2008 15:26
        
        Re: Why did it take 50 years? - Rosco : 2/8/2008 16:10
        
        Versatile SP - Ernie : 2/8/2008 20:25
  - RE: Was there an early self propelled JD? - 1206SWMO : 2/8/2008 22:01
- RE:You know - Don Kraft : 2/8/2008 10:09
  - RE:You know - 4430 : 2/8/2008 10:37
    - RE:You know - CW IL : 2/8/2008 11:27
      - Shattered soybeans felt like - 4430 : 2/8/2008 12:31
- Re: Why did it take 50 years? - B54 : 2/8/2008 11:59
- Pull Type - sodbuster_06 : 2/8/2008 12:07
  - Re: Why did it take 50 years? - tbeck : 2/8/2008 12:17
    - Here's a chart - plow79 : 2/8/2008 12:26
  - RE: Pull Type - Chad H : 2/8/2008 12:26
  - RE: Pull Type - Jon Hagen : 2/8/2008 13:40
  - RE: Pull Type - 3688 : 2/8/2008 23:10
    - RE: Pull Type - plowboy : 2/9/2008 00:06
    - RE: Pull Type - Rosco : 2/9/2008 00:41
- Re: Why did it take 50 years? - Dan_wcIN : 2/8/2008 12:36
  - Re: Why did it take 50 years? - Don Kraft : 2/8/2008 16:25
  - Re: Why did it take 50 years? - plowboy : 2/9/2008 00:13
    - Re: Why did it take 50 years? - Dan_wcIN : 2/9/2008 11:33
- Re: Why did it take 50 years? - JohnKS : 2/8/2008 19:05
  - Because of the Surplus Battleship part - Dan_wcIN : 2/8/2008 19:35
    - RE: Because of the Surplus Battleship part - Jon Hagen : 2/8/2008 19:40
      - RE: Because of the Surplus Battleship part - Dan_wcIN : 2/8/2008 20:37
        
        Re: Why did it take 50 years? - McCartman : 2/8/2008 21:40
      - Here's the Cross Flow Blower + Rotary Heat Exchanger - Dan_wcIN : 2/8/2008 22:24
        
        RE: Here's the Cross Flow Blower + Rotary Heat Exchanger - Jon Hagen : 2/8/2008 23:47
        Re: Why did it take 50 years? - trakman : 2/9/2008 07:39
        
        Yes to Twin Grain Tanks - Dan_wcIN : 2/9/2008 07:46
        Massey - Kooiker : 2/9/2008 08:44
  - Re: Why did it take 50 years? - dave morgan : 2/8/2008 23:33
    - Which Gleaner? - Ed Boysun : 2/9/2008 10:29
  - Re: Why did it take 50 years? - plowboy : 2/9/2008 00:10

Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete cookies)