|
| Your missing two important elements for the no-call concept to apply. The first of it being a 'subjective call," meaning judgment of the ruling is divided amongst individual interpretation. The other part is the "off the ball" element or the away-from the play concept, which obviously denotes actions that carry a degree of separation from the ball in play.
Your example has none of those elements unlike the play that unfolded last night. Therefore the "swallow the whistle" concept need not apply to your example put forth.
The reason I'm saying why the very nature of that moving screen should not have been called, is the very same reason why I 'm not screaming where's the holding foul by the Iowa defender on an 85% free-throw UConn player that happened only seconds earlier. That type of foul was called multiple times earlier in the game. What would be your feelings if that call was made?
Mav
Edited by Mav 4/6/2024 14:57
| |
|
Let’s go Hawkeyes.
