East Central South Dakota | There are stacks of data on the fallacies of the carbon fantasy. You are not going to find it with a normal google search because the ruling elite use algorithms to depress the search for material they don't want seen. Facebook used it in elections, and it is a standard operating procedure in social media. Now add AI as a power tool to spread the agenda. The narrative is controlled by institutions that want to use climate change as a pathway to power and money. When "global warming" loses headlines because parts of the planet are starting to cool again, change to message to "climate change". I could put link after link of scientists that have "data" and support documentation on the false hoods of climate change. Some scientists have lost their careers for going against the power grab of climate science. Peer review is an absolute joke that is mostly used to bully and intimidate. Anything coming out of the academia field is 98% garbage produced with bias and an agenda. If you want to lose out on Federal grants for the rest of your career, report findings that go against the narrative. Our own alma Mater (SDSU) came out with a poll, right before the election, of Govenor Noem ahead in her last election by only 4%. +/- 5% error. She won 62% to 35%. The SDSU poll was political science departments using biased crap trying to influence the election and the physical science departments across the country do the same thing. The founder of Green Peace has been ostracized from the environmental movement for his stance against the science of climate change. Lots of data out there that doesn't support the movement and is constantly suppressed.
Here is some data think for yourself. The atmosphere is .04% carbon dioxide. That is 421 PPM of CO2 in the atmosphere and 1000 PPM CO2 is very close to the optimum level of CO2 for plant growth in green houses. Man made carbon accounts for about only 5-9 % of the carbon cycle. The United States accounts for only 13% of the manmade carbon. How much data do you need if you are not willing to open your mind and think for yourself. Do the math. The most powerful physician in the world said if you get the shot and wear a mask you will not get Covid (the data was just a false narrative). Same group of folks pushing climate change and the same group of people that hid in bunkers for y2k. Data that is falsely cherry picked is propaganda not data.
Scientific findings are hypotheses that encompass the state of knowledge at a given moment. In the long run, many of are challenged and even overturned. Doubt might be troubling, but it impels us towards a better understanding; certainties, as reassuring as they may seem, in fact undermine the scientific process.
When science can no longer be questioned, it is no longer science. It then becomes belief or dogma or doctrine or religion. We're all seeing a lot of criticism at the moment about asking questions. About being curious.
Edited by white shadow 3/6/2024 11:20
|
Fighting the Eminent Domain Takeover of Farms and Ranches
