AgTalk Home
AgTalk Home
Search Forums | Classifieds (149) | Skins | Language
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )

Bernanke speaks today.. "Thanks farmers...?"
View previous thread :: View next thread
   Forums List -> Market TalkMessage format
 
zenfarm
Posted 7/21/2010 12:36 (#1282237 - in reply to #1281964)
Subject: RE: Bernanke speaks today.. "Thanks farmers...?"


South central kansas



 

 "I believe Ben has done an outstanding job.. he alone might deserve credit for keeping the country out of a depression." 

 

 Jon, not trying to get your goat, so to speak, but from my perspective I think Bernanke and Gov't policy makers have done a lousy job, the Fed for bailing out bondholders at the expense of the taxpayer and giving a virtually unlimited backstop to Fannie and Freddie, which by the lastest figures could approach 1 trillion dollars and to believe that the fed or Gov't will make any money on all the bailouts, is in my estimation wishful thinking. 

The following from John Hussman, clearly points out that we are living on "borrowed" time and the policy responses by the fed and gov't only insure greater trouble down the road.

 

Don't Take the Bait

John P. Hussman, Ph.D.
All rights reserved and actively enforced.

Reprint Policy

Breaking News: Philly Fed Survey at 5.1, Showing that Growth Is Firming at a Slower Pace

"This was an item that appeared on CNBC MobileWeb on Thursday. Read that headline again. Growth is firming. At a slower pace. Talk about "spin." You can't make this stuff up.

Important metrics of economic activity are slowing rapidly. Notably, the ECRI weekly leading index slipped last week to a growth rate of -9.8%. While the index itself was reported as unchanged, this was because of a downward revision to the prior week's reading to 120.6 from the originally reported 121.5. The previous week's WLI growth rate was revised to -9.1% from the originally reported -8.3% rate. Meanwhile, the Philadelphia Fed Survey dropped to 5.1 from 8.0 in June, while the Empire State Manufacturing Index slipped to 5.1 from 20.1. The Conference Board reported that spending plans for autos, homes, and major appliances within the next six months all dropped sharply. These figures are now at or below the worst levels of the recent economic downturn, and are two standard deviations below their respective norms - something you don't observe during economic expansions.

As I've frequently noted, the first year of post-war economic recoveries are invariably paced by strong growth in credit-sensitive spending such as housing, autos, appliances and capital goods. While government programs such as Cash-for-Clunkers and the first-time homebuyers' credit did bring forward a great deal of demand to produce short spikes in activity, we continue to observe a failure of the private economy to pick up where government spending now trails off.

There was a bit of good news last week in that new claims for unemployment (seasonally adjusted) dropped by 29,000 to 429,000. Still, much of this decline can be attributed to the fact that several manufacturers, including General Motors, skipped their usual summer layoffs. While the seasonal adjustment factors are smaller for the weekly claims data than they are for the monthly employment data (see Notes on a Difficult Employment Outlook - February 22, 2010), it's clear that last week's figure benefited from a downward seasonal adjustment factor applied to data that did not require it. As usual, the 4-week moving average, at 455,250, is more informative. Incrementing the latest week's data by about 20,000 to reflect the excessive seasonal factor would imply a 4-week average of roughly 460,000, fairly consistent with the other data we're observing. Given the likelihood of heavy job cuts at the state and local levels in the next few quarters, these figures are at odds with the notion that the economy is in a durable recovery.

Economic Policy Notes

The U.S. economy continues to face the predictable effects of credit obligations that quite simply exceed the cash flows available to service them, coupled with the predictable shift away from the consumption patterns that produced these obligations. The misguided response of our policy makers has been to defend bondholders at all costs, using public funds to make sure that lenders get 100 cents on the dollar, plus interest, while at the same time desperately trying to prod consumers back to their former patterns of overconsumption. These policies are designed to preserve exactly the reckless and unsustainable behavior that caused the recent downturn. They are likely to fail because the strategy is absurd. The ultimate outcome, which will be forced upon us eventually if we do not pursue it deliberately, will be the eventual restructuring of debt obligations and a gradual shift in the profile of U.S. economic activity toward greater saving - either to finance exploding government deficits, or preferably, to finance an expansion in productive investment, research and development, and capital accumulation.

From my perspective, bolder approaches are required. Debt that cannot be serviced should be restructured, rather than socializing the losses of reckless private decision-making. We will inevitably have a large "stimulus" package, but it will be essential to craft it in a way that emphasizes incentives to create and accumulate productive capital, both private and public."




 

Top of the page Bottom of the page


Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete cookies)