|
| if youve wondered what collateral backs up the national debt, it sounds like some of it is contracts on esg type stuff. from government funded windmill leases, to conservation reserve contracts. and ill bet this carbon index stuff for aviation fuel has government claws on it in some form. glad i didnt sign the 90 year windmill contract, but i do have some crp filter strips.
trent loos gave a quick explanation on his thursday loos tales program.
https://www.loostalesmedia.com/
https://hageman.house.gov/media/in-the-news/natural-asset-companies-...
R-CALF USA
Tri-State Livestock News
Quietly, on September 29, 2023, the Securities and Exchange Commission, at the request of the New York Stock Exchange, proposed a rule to create a new type of company called a Natural Asset Company (NAC). According to the proposed rule, a NAC would “hold the rights to ecological performance,” giving these companies license to control the management of both public and private lands through quantifying and monetizing natural outputs such as air and water. In other words, NACs would use the air you breathe as currency.
Under the guise of climate change, NACs would make this “control” mechanism profitable without the actual use of the land itself. By monetizing and leveraging the management of these natural outputs their war cry of “ecological performance” would fall under the rules of sustainable development. “Natural assets” would now belong to corporations that are potentially run by special interest groups such as The Nature Conservancy and the World Wildlife Fund, thereby requiring all production tied to the land to fall under the sustainability rules established by these non-governmental organizations.
It doesn’t stop there. Land belonging to sovereign nations like the United States of America and private landowners can be subject to the control of NACs. For example, China could invest in a NAC which would effectively create their stakeholder position in a national or state park, placing them off limits for any kind of production or resource development. It is also possible that private landowners could involuntarily cede control of their land to NACs, such as through the rules of a conservation easement or other program that a current or previous landowner has participated or is participating in.
So, what is the motive behind all this? The answer is power and money, and…total control.
It appears the government intends to hand control over natural assets to the NACs as reports indicate that plans are underway to track the values of natural assets and place them on a federal balance sheet.
| |
|
natural asset companies
