| Brian Dripka - 5/23/2023 08:53
But might I digress. Not true because the spreadsheet had the vibration projection at 5.90, then the original uptrend line at 5.75 and lastly the overriding ML at 5.50. Al are exceptional targets with intelligent reasoning behind them. They just didn’t correspond with the right “time”.
So are you saying here that the Gann stuff was wrong and the Andrews ML worked? I think I remember JP saying that ML are always projecting price and time.
And I don't understand why you are using a target to get long. Wouldn't a target be a place to take your profits and not be road kill? For sure if you did what you recommended here, you got your butt handed to you...
A suggestion...if you take posting here seriously, you might find that others will take you seriously....Vince
|