|
| yeah you can't be far off i remember right around the 154 mark also, even with a 164 BPA yield the 300M reduction would that would still leave a 160BPA yield and lanworth would still be 6BPA off.
What upsets me is that the average trade projections right before the report were right around a 160BPA with no one projecting a 164. How can 20 other smaller private firms all do yield surveys and be within a couple bushel yet the USDA puts out a number higher then all. Then 9 months AFTER harvest they say it just disapeared. I Can't believe we still follow the USDA's numbers after there rollercoaster reports. | |
|
Lanworth's crop guess might be right after all
