AgTalk Home
AgTalk Home
Search Forums | Classifieds (23) | Skins | Language
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )

La nina
View previous thread :: View next thread
   Forums List -> Market TalkMessage format
 
zenfarm
Posted 7/7/2010 08:21 (#1263631)
Subject: La nina


South central kansas



   The current trend toward La Nina continues, what impact will that have on grains??(I'm a HRW wheat producer, so my main concern is with that crop for the upcoming year), the only data I have was done a number of years ago and looks at La Nina during northern Hemisphere winters and their is a strong negative correlation between the strength of the La Nina and HRW wheat yields in the Southern Plains.
 

 

Trend towards La Niña continues.

Issued on Wednesday 7 July 2010 | Product Code IDCKGEWWOO

Sea surface temperatures in the central equatorial Pacific have continued to cool over the past fortnight, and hence the tropical Pacific is now generally cooler than average east of the date-line. Below the surface, temperatures also remain significantly cooler than average, with some areas more than 4°C cooler than normal. Trade winds in the western Pacific remain stronger than normal and cloudiness near the date-line continues to be suppressed. These indicators, together with the Southern Oscillation Index (SOI), which has been positive since April, are consistent with the developing stages of a La Niña event.

The majority of climate models surveyed by the Bureau suggest current patterns and trends will continue, with a significant likelihood of further ocean cooling beyond La Niña thresholds before the end of the southern winter.

Historically, about 35 to 40% of El Niño events (such as occurred in 2009/10) are followed by a La Niña within the same year. The combination of current trends and model outlooks suggest the chance of a La Niña in 2010 is now clearly more likely than not.

Information about the historic relationship between ENSO events and Australian climate can be viewed here.

Next update expected by 21 July 2010 | print version

  The following data is from the  Ag research service in Lubbock, TX and was compiled by Dr, Steven Mauget and Dr. Dan R Church and looks at the yield impact of wheat and corn yields for both La Nina  and El Nino events.

The full research can be found at:http://www.lbk.ars.usda.gov/WEWC/ensoag.aspx
 

 

Table 1: Effects on Corn Yield After El Niño (6+) and La Niña (6-,10-) July-August-September Periods.

Illinois

# Harvests

Below Normal

Near Normal

Above Normal

Significance

After Warm JAS (6+)

12

0

3

9

98.81%

After Cold JAS (6-)

18

10

5

3

99.46%

After Cold JAS (10-)

8

6

1

1

99.50%

All Years (1881-1994)

114

31

37

46

 

Indiana

     

After Warm JAS (6+)

12

0

4

8

96.23%

After Cold JAS (6-)

18

8

6

4

91.61%

After Cold JAS (10-)

8

3

4

1

88.71%

All Years (1881-1994)

114

29

32

39

 

Iowa

After Warm JAS

12

2

4

6

79.80%

After Cold JAS (6-)

18

7

8

3

94.86%

After Cold JAS (10-)

8

5

2

1

93.60%

All Years (1881-1994)

114

36

37

41

 

Nebraska

     

After Warm JAS

12

2

3

7

86.60%

After Cold JAS (6-)

18

7

8

3

97.45%

After Cold JAS (10-)

8

3

5

0

98.48%

All Years (1881-1994)

114

34

35

45

 

Minnesota

After Warm JAS (6+)

12

3

0

9

98.33%

After Cold JAS (6-)

18

6

7

5

86.07%

After Cold JAS (10-)

8

2

3

3

****

All Years (1881-1994)

114

30

36

48

 

Table 1. Entries show the number of total and below, near, and above normal corn harvests after July-August-September periods marked by extreme S index conditions. "All years" entries indicate those same counts for the (1881-1994) population of harvests for each state. 6+ (6-) indicates SSTA conditions above (below) the highest (lowest) sextile of the historical distribution. 10- indicates SSTA conditions below the lowest decile; i.e., in the lowest 10% of values. Significance levels apply to the bold and underlined entries in each row. Thus underlined near and above normal counts shows a tendency to near and above normal harvests at the corresponding significance level, etc.

To TopTo Implications for Management



Table 2: Effects on Winter Wheat Yield After El Niño (6+) and La Niña (6-) November-December-January Periods.


Kansas

# Harvests

Below Normal

Near Normal

Above Normal

Significance

After Warm NDJ (6+)

19

3

5

11

98.65%

After Cold NDJ(6-)

20

11

7

2

94.55%

All Years (1909-1994)

86

32

25

29

 

Oklahoma

     

After Warm NDJ (6+)

19

2

6

11

99.05%

After Cold NDJ (6-)

20

14

3

3

99.95%

All Years (1909-1994)

86

31

27

28

 

Texas

     

After Warm NDJ (6+)

19

0

8

11

99.04%

After Cold NDJ (6-)

20

13

5

2

99.59%

All Years (1909-1994)

86

32

26

28

 

Nebraska

     

After Warm NDJ (6+)

19

5

5

9

89.89%

After Cold NDJ (6-)

20

11

2

7

94.55%

All Years (1909-1994)

86

32

26

28

 

Colorado

     

After Warm NDJ (6+)

19

5

5

9

92.00%

After Cold NDJ (6-)

20

11

4

5

92.99%

All Years (1909-1994)

86

33

26

27

NA

Table 2. Entries show the number of total and below, near, and above normal winter wheat harvests after November-December-January periods marked by extreme S index conditions. "All years" entries indicate those same counts for the (1909-1994) population of harvests for each state. 6+ (6-) indicates SSTA conditions above (below) the highest (lowest) sextile etc. Significance levels apply to the bold and underlined entries in each row. Thus underlined near and above normal counts shows a tendency to near and above normal harvests at the corresponding significance level, etc.

To TopTo Implications for Management
   

 

 

 

 



Edited by zenfarm 7/7/2010 08:57
Top of the page Bottom of the page


Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete cookies)