AgTalk Home
Search
Forums
|
Classifieds (85)
|
Skins
|
Language
You are logged in as a guest. (
logon
|
register
)
4630 compared to 4430
View previous thread
::
View next thread
Forums List
->
Machinery Talk
Message format
Flat
Threaded
Nested
fjlip
Posted
10/3/2014 20:21 (#4107866 - in reply to #4106350)
Subject:
RE: 4630 compared to 4430
N East Sask, Canada
Had a 79 4640, lot more power and torque with the 466. Better on fuel. Nicer cab, huge fuel tank, hydra cushion seat, no issues.
4630 compared to 4430
-
New Guy
: 7/10/2006 21:01
RE: 4630 compared to 4430
-
Guest
: 7/10/2006 21:39
Re: 4630 compared to 4430
-
msb
: 7/10/2006 22:52
Re: 4630 compared to 4430
-
Don Smith
: 7/10/2006 23:16
Re: 4630 compared to 4430
-
cynic
: 7/10/2006 22:56
Re: 4630 compared to 4430
-
ronm
: 7/10/2006 23:33
Re: 4630 compared to 4430
-
dixonman
: 7/13/2006 21:08
RE: 4630 compared to 4430
-
hillrunner
: 3/16/2014 11:36
RE: 4630 compared to 4430
-
McFarmer
: 3/16/2014 15:32
RE: 4630 compared to 4430
-
Mntaxedtodeath
: 10/3/2014 05:26
RE: 4630 compared to 4430
-
fjlip
: 10/3/2014 20:21
Jump to forum :
Forums List
----------------------
+ Machinery Talk
+ Where Can I find?????
+ Crop Talk
+ Stock Talk
+ AgTalk Cafe
+ Kitchen Table
+ Precision Talk
+ Drone Talk
+ Computer Talk
+ Market Talk
+ Test Forum
+ FAQ & Support
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread
(
Delete cookies
)